Immer weniger Malariatote: Welche Rolle spielt der Klimawandel?

Der Klimawandel gilt als Hauptschuldiger für das meiste Übel der Welt. So wird vermutet, dass die globale Erwärmung auch das Malariarisiko verschärft. Schauen wir auf die offizielle Statistik der Malariatoten (Abb. 1):

Abb. 1: Entwicklung der Malariatoten währen der letzten anderthalb Jahrzehnte. Quelle:


Ein überrraschendes Ergebnis. Mit Dank an notalotofpeopleknowthat.


Ein neuer Bericht der GWPF zur überstürzten Dekarbonisierung weist auf gravierende Konsequenzen für den ärmeren Teil der Weltbevölkerung auf:

Efforts to decarbonise will kill millions in poor countries

A new report from the Global Warming Policy Foundation finds that climate and green energy policies promoted by development organisations will cause millions of preventable deaths in the developing world. 

The report, by eminent epidemiologist Mikko Paunio, says that international bodies and NGOs are trying to prevent poor countries from expanding their use of conventional fuels, have abandoned the so-called “energy ladder”  — the gradual shift to cleaner types of fuel that underpinned the clean up of air quality in industrialised nations. As Dr Paunio explains, this will have devastating consequences:

“Indoor air pollution from domestic fires kills millions every year. But instead of helping poor people to climb the energy ladder and clean the air in their communities, the poorest people are being given gimmicks like cookstoves, which make little difference to air quality, and solar panels, which are little more than a joke.”

What is worse, the greens inside and outside the development community are blaming air pollution on power stations, industry and cars, as a way to prevent any shift to industrial power production. As Dr Paunio makes clear, most air pollution in poor countries is in fact caused by burning low-quality biofuels and coal in domestic stoves:

“Trying to blame power stations for indoor air pollution might make greens feel they are saving the planet, but the reality is that they are allowing millions of deaths from air pollution to continue. The body count is going to rival that of the totalitarian regimes of the twentieth century.”

Executive Summary: 200 Million At Risk

Domestic combustion of solid (bio)fuels is by far the number one global pollution problem. 4.3 million deaths annually are directly attributable to indoor air pollution (IAP) according to the World Health Organization. Domestic combustion of solid biofuels kills almost six million people per year when its effects on ambient air quality are also taken into consideration.

The so called ‘energy ladder’ was introduced as a way of understanding how deaths from IAP might be prevented. The energy ladder seeks to reproduce the experience of rich countries, where households moved away from biofuels and were increasingly connected to electric grids or district heating systems, solving the IAP problem for good.

However, ever-growing resistance from the environmental movement has removed this beneficial approach from the development agenda. Environmentalists fear that by taking steps upwards on the energy ladder, from dirty solid fuels such as cow dung or crop residues, and towards use of electricity, poor countries would become wealthier and so increase their energy use and their carbon intensity. They have managed to persuade all important multilateral development bodies and the WHO to drop the energy ladder entirely. Instead, they are now coercing the poorest countries to adopt utopian energy policies based on renewables. The result is that combatting IAP in, say, sub-Saharan Africa, is becoming impossible.

Aggressive decarbonization is now high on the political agenda. Contrary to the widely disseminated claims of important global actors, this will not solve the problem of IAP. Moreover, it will hamper the expansion of electric grids, which is a critical prerequisite for delivering adequate water supplies, without which it will be impossible to reproduce the public health miracle experienced in the rich countries.

These ‘ambitious’ global climate mitigation policies leave environmental health problems amongst the poor unaddressed and will result in the loss of over 200 million lives by 2050. They are also unlikely – even in theory – to prevent the 250,000 annual deaths that the WHO speculates will be attributable to climate change between 2030 and 2050: high-quality IPCC-linked research has recently shown that solid biomass combustion actually increases CO2 emissions, at least over the next 100 years, compared to fossil fuels.

Full paper (pdf): Kicking Away The Energy Ladder: How environmentalism destroys hope for the poorest


Noch vor kurzem engagierte sich der New York Generalstaatsanwalt Eric Schneiderman intensiv bei der Hexenjagd auf Energieunternehmen, die seiner Meinung nach das Weltklima zum Kollaps brächten. Ein grüner Heilsbringer, der für eine bessere Welt kämpft? Weit gefehlt. Anfang Mai 2018 brachte The New Yorker einen Artikel, in dem ihm vier ehemalige Partnerinnen vorwerfen, er habe sie geschlagen, gewürgt, grob behandelt, erniedrigt und bedroht. Drei Stunden nach Veröffentlichung des Artikels trat Schneiderman von seinem Amt zurück. Erinnerungen an den ehemaligen IPCC-Chef Rajendra Pachauri werden wach. Jener trat 2015 wegen des Vorwurfs der sexuellen Belästigung zurück.

Was treibt prominente Klimaaktivisten zu solch unakzeptablem Verhalten? Ist es die fundamental-religiöse Klimawut, mit der sie nicht klarkommen und die sich im Privatleben dann in offene Aggressionen umwandelt? Ein langer Spaziergang in der Natur würde hier helfen. Dies baut schwelede Ängste ab. Die Natur ist nicht unser Feind, sondern unser Freund. Wenn man hinter jedem Wind, jedem Regentropfen, jedem Sonnenstrahl immer gleich eine Klimakatastrophe vermutet, entstehen Phobien, die im Endstadium psychologisch behandelt werden sollten.